Teachers/Scholars/Translators will often attribute numerous views to the Buddha far removed from his teachings.
For example, here are 21 example of what the Buddha did not teach:
- A founder of a religion with religious forms and rituals
- A separate self/a non-separate self
- Consciousness as the Absolute
- Detachment
- Free Will
- Intense meditation practice
- Inter-connectedness
- Just being
- Liberation through meditation
- Life is suffering
- Living in the present moment
- Mantras
- Master-disciple relationship
- No thinking nor a thought-out philosophy
- Oneness
- Sub-atomic particles (kalapas in Pali)
- The Now
- The reification of mindfulness
- Truth is within you
- Vipassana (insight) is a technique
- We create our own reality
It would be appreciated if writers/teachers/scholar/translators named the location in the text when stating what the Buddha said or possibly said – if we rely upon the Pali language and a reasonably accurate translation.
Why? The adopting, settling for and holding to such above standpoints obstruct liberation.
I have no interest to try to preserve a certain interpretation of the teachings.
Liberation takes priority.
Known as the Dharma, the teachings can contribute to wisdom. For some people, the Dharma makes a major and indispensable contribution to a liberated way of life.
Immediately preceding blog explores the
importance of the
Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha.
Om A Hung Janadakini Vajra Guru Hung
Möge die in sich selbst entstandene Weisheit sich durch geschickte Mittel vervollkommnen.
The Buddha, you mean Siddhartha Gautama?